Free handball tips and predictions |
|
The match outcome predictions in this case are not sorted by date or by competition, but rather by the probability of success based on our estimate of the likely winner.
All betting tips across different competitions are sorted by the INDEX value. The INDEX value, in simplified terms, represents twice the expected score difference of the match, calculated by our algorithm. You can click on every row to open the betting tip and view detailed statistics about the match.
If a betting tip at the end of the row is marked with the number 1 on a green background, it means our algorithm favors the home team to win. Conversely, if the betting tip is marked with the number 2 on a red background, it indicates that our algorithm predicts the away team to win.
Always consider betting tips as our inspiration and non-binding opinion. If you participate in betting games on sports event outcomes, always handle your money with caution. Never invest more money than you can afford to lose without facing financial difficulties. This principle applies to any financial investment.
| betting predictions | VITISPORT TIP | INDEX | |||||||||||
| score | 1 | 0 | 2 | tip | |||||||||
| 27.12 | HSG Bensheim/Auerbach W | SV Union Halle-Neustadt W | 39 | : | 26 | 87 % | 5 % | 8 % | 1 | 25.2 | |||
| 27.12 | BV Borussia 09 Dortmund W | Frisch Auf Göppingen W | 38 | : | 28 | 82 % | 6 % | 12 % | 1 | 19.6 | |||
| 27.12 | TSV Burgdorf | TSV GWD Minden | 34 | : | 26 | 77 % | 6 % | 16 % | 1 | 17.0 | |||
| 27.12 | Füchse Berlin | Frisch Auf ! Göppingen | 35 | : | 27 | 76 % | 6 % | 18 % | 1 | 16.3 | |||
| 26.12 | IK Sävehof | VästerasIrsta HF | 35 | : | 27 | 75 % | 6 % | 19 % | 1 | 15.6 | |||
| 26.12 | TBV Lemgo | HSG Wetzlar | 32 | : | 25 | 72 % | 7 % | 21 % | 1 | 14.2 | |||
| 26.12 | SG Flensburg/Handewitt | Bergischer HC | 35 | : | 28 | 72 % | 7 % | 22 % | 1 | 13.9 | |||
| 27.12 | VfL Oldenburg W | HSG Blomberg-Lippe W | 26 | : | 33 | 22 % | 7 % | 71 % | 2 | -13.6 | |||
| 23.12 | HC Kriens Luzern | BSV Bern Muri | 34 | : | 28 | 69 % | 7 % | 23 % | 1 | 12.8 | |||
| 26.12 | IF Hallby HK | IFK Kristianstad | 27 | : | 33 | 25 % | 7 % | 68 % | 2 | -12.1 | |||
| 26.12 | Vinslövs HK | Enköpings HF | 33 | : | 28 | 66 % | 8 % | 27 % | 1 | 10.9 | |||
| 27.12 | ThSV Eisenach | SC Magdeburg | 27 | : | 32 | 27 % | 8 % | 65 % | 2 | -10.6 | |||
| 27.12 | VfL Gummersbach | HSV Handball Hamburg | 33 | : | 28 | 65 % | 8 % | 27 % | 1 | 10.5 | |||
| 26.12 | THW Kiel | HC Erlangen | 32 | : | 27 | 64 % | 8 % | 29 % | 1 | 9.8 | |||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| 23.12 | SC Magdeburg | THW Kiel | 33 | : | 28 | 64 % | 8 % | 29 % | 1 | 9.7 | |||
| 28.12 | HSG Krefeld Niederrhein | HSG Nordhorn-Lingen | 28 | : | 33 | 29 % | 8 % | 63 % | 2 | -9.3 | |||
| 26.12 | MT Melsungen | TVB 1898 Stuttgart | 31 | : | 27 | 61 % | 8 % | 31 % | 1 | 8.5 | |||
| 26.12 | Alingsas HK | HIF Karlskrona | 33 | : | 29 | 60 % | 8 % | 32 % | 1 | 7.9 | |||
| 27.12 | TuS Metzingen W | Neckarsulmer Sport-Union W | 33 | : | 30 | 57 % | 9 % | 34 % | 1 | 6.5 | |||
| 26.12 | HK Malmö | OV Helsingborg | 33 | : | 30 | 57 % | 9 % | 35 % | 1 | 6.1 | |||
| 26.12 | TV 05/07 Hüttenberg | Eulen Ludwigshafen | 31 | : | 28 | 56 % | 9 % | 35 % | 1 | 5.8 | |||
| 27.12 | SC DHfK Leipzig | Rhein-Neckar Löwen | 28 | : | 31 | 36 % | 9 % | 56 % | 2 | -5.6 | |||
| 27.12 | IFK Ystad HK | HK Aranäs | 32 | : | 29 | 56 % | 9 % | 36 % | 1 | 5.5 | |||
| 27.12 | Önnereds HK | IF Guif | 31 | : | 28 | 55 % | 9 % | 36 % | 1 | 5.4 | |||
| 26.12 | Lugi HF | HK Varberg | 31 | : | 28 | 55 % | 9 % | 36 % | 1 | 5.1 | |||
| 27.12 | TV Großwallstadt | HSC 2000 Coburg | 30 | : | 32 | 38 % | 9 % | 53 % | 2 | -4.1 | |||
| 23.12 | Eulen Ludwigshafen | HSG Nordhorn-Lingen | 28 | : | 30 | 38 % | 9 % | 52 % | 2 | -3.9 | |||
| 26.12 | Dessau-Roßlauer HV | HC Elbflorenz 2006 | 31 | : | 33 | 39 % | 9 % | 52 % | 2 | -3.7 | |||
| 27.12 | Amo HK | Hammarby Handboll | 31 | : | 33 | 39 % | 9 % | 51 % | 2 | -3.4 | |||
| 27.12 | BSV Sachsen Zwickau W | Thüringer HC W | 31 | : | 32 | 41 % | 9 % | 50 % | 2 | -2.6 | |||
| 27.12 | TSV Bayer Dormagen | VfL Lübeck-Schwartau | 32 | : | 31 | 50 % | 9 % | 41 % | 1 | 2.5 | |||
| 26.12 | TUSEM Essen | TuS Ferndorf | 29 | : | 30 | 41 % | 9 % | 50 % | 2 | -2.4 | |||
| 26.12 | HC Oppenweiler/Backnang | TuS N-Lübbecke | 29 | : | 30 | 43 % | 10 % | 48 % | 2 | -1.4 | |||
| 26.12 | VfL Eintracht Hagen | 1. VfL Potsdam | 31 | : | 31 | 47 % | 10 % | 44 % | 1 | 0.8 | |||
| 27.12 | IFK Skövde HK | Ystads IF | 30 | : | 30 | 46 % | 10 % | 44 % | 1 | 0.3 | |||
| 27.12 | SG BBM Bietigheim | HBW Balingen-Weilstetten | 29 | : | 29 | 45 % | 10 % | 45 % | 02 | -0.2 | |||